Divorce Court Delusions

When most men are confronted with the whirlwind of court and divorce the aren’t sure what to do. Even an attorney will hire a divorce lawyer when getting divorced. Of course, the ex-wife is making sure this whirlwind turns into a hurricane to make him look unstable or unfit to parent, whichever suites her needs. Most men don’t know the first thing about court, law, or legal contracts. It’s not taught in schools, it’s not taught in colleges, and it’s not even taught in most law schools. Why?
They are in on it. Anyone practicing law in government, privately, or for a firm has a Certificate of Admission to the BAR association. What most people don’t know is that there is no actual license to practice law in the United States and most other countries.
The UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT held a long time ago that The practice of Law CANNOT be licensed by any state/State. This was so stated in a case named Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 (1957) and is located for all to read at the following pages in volume 353 U.S. pgs.238, 239 of the United States Reports. Here is a quote from that case:
“A State cannot exclude a person from the practice of law or from any other occupation in a manner or for reasons that contravene the Due Process or Equal Protection [353 U.S. 232, 239] Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 5 Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U.S. 114 . Cf. Slochower v. Board of Education, 350 U.S. 551 ; Wieman v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183 . And see Ex parte Secombe, 19 How. 9, 13. A State can require high standards of qualification, such as good moral character or proficiency in its law, before it admits an applicant to the bar, but any qualification must have a rational connection with the applicant’s fitness or capacity to practice law. Douglas v. Noble, 261 U.S. 165 ; Cummings v. Missouri, 4 Wall. 277, 319-320. Cf. Nebbia v. New York, 291 U.S. 502 . Obviously an applicant could not be excluded merely because he was a Republican or a Negro or a member of a particular church. Even in applying permissible standards, officers of a State cannot exclude an applicant when there is no basis for their finding that he fails to meet these standards, or when their action is invidiously discriminatory. Cf. Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 .”
[Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 (1957), emphasis added]
Another case which bore this out was PDF Sims v. Ahrens, 271 S.W. 720 (1925). In this case the opinion of the court was that:
“The practice of Law is an occupation of common right.”
Where some confusion may start is when one doesn’t understand that a state supreme court only issues a CERTIFICATE, and that is not a license. All a certificate does is authorize one of those dirt-bags to practice Law “IN COURTS” as a member of the state judicial branch of government. [Please see NOTE 1 below to see that there is no judicial branch of government as we have been led to believe all our lives] A plain truth of fact is that Attorneys are ‘foreign agents’, the same as Federal Agents from the bowels of hell known as WASHINGTON, DC, and can only represent wards of the court; infants and persons of unsound mind. [The reader would be surprised to find out that according to them, we’re all of unsound mind that is; we’re considered incompetent to handle our own affairs.] [Please see NOTE 2 below for a reference in a law dictionary which explains this concept
Further, as a CERTIFICATE IS NOT A LICENSE then it also gives no power to anyone to practice Law AS AN OCCUPATION, nor to DO BUSINESS AS A LAW FIRM.
The state bar association is not a government entity. The state bar ass…is “PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION” and their “STATE BAR” CARD IS NOT A LICENSE either. All that card is – is a “UNION DUES CARD” like the Actors Union, Painters Union, Electricians union etc. Did the reader know that there is no other association, not even DOCTORS, who issue their own license. All other licenses are issued by the state or local municipal corporations . Any one can ask their state Attorney General if the members of the BAR are licensed by the state or any other governmental agency. The reader will find out in short order that the state doesn’t issue licenses for Attorney’s and that said attorneys are NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE ASSOCIATION.
Therefore by reason logic and common sense we can arrive a the determination that the ‘state bar ass… is; an unconstitutional monopoly, and thus an ILLEGAL & CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE. Since the majority, if not all of government offices are filled with Attorneys there is a definite violation of the separation of powers clause of a constitutional government.
Attorneys are nothing less than ‘foreign agents’ on our land as they are foreign to a constitutional government. They have NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive branches of a constitutional government, no matter if the so called people vote for them. It is against a Republican form of constitutional government law for them to even attempt to ‘run for office’ (sic). Of course this would include all judges as well as members of the other branches of a constitutional government
NOTE 1: In a Municipal Corporation, which is what all states (once called union States) are today. In Municipal Corporation Law there is no judicial branch. The judges, which we see today and, which we’ve seen all our lives, are administrative law judges appointed by the CEO of the Executive branch. ]. Some other time be an offer my conclusions, including the references which I used to make said conclusion. A little hint: If one could just understand how a W-4, which is of no lawful effect after 1 year, has its continued effect on someone who does not disclaim it’s effect but instead allows the effect to continue for as long as that person is employed with the Federal employer he filed it with. The relate that same effect to the effect that the Birth Certificate has to one’s continued effect of being incompetent to handle your own affairs – even if you’re 67 years old like this old goat]
“It has come to my attention that numerous individuals in our state have rescinded all of their contracts with the united states federal government, the state of [], and each of its political subdivisions. – I urge you to inform yourself and your personnel of the contractual nature of auto registration and driver’s licenses, it is conceivable that this situation may lead to confrontation between these individuals and law enFORCEment personnel. In so much as this procedure is entirely appropriate”
Click Here to View the Full Letter from a Senator Speaking About Contracting with the Government

According to the Judges own Judicial Code of Conduct, when everyone involved is in the same club it is a conflict of interest. When all parties have a Certificate of Admission to the BAR association, NOT A LICENSE, there is a clear conflict of interest. Who benefits from the court process? The government, the lawyers, the judges, the women ect. NOT YOU.
They are all in on it. They are literally using fake legalese to take your house, money, assets, and even children! They have no real authority, that’s why you have to sign all that paperwork. You are literally consenting to their legalese. They are a literal mafia stealing your fruits. Seriously stop and think, HOW could you have a fair trial if ALL parties benefit from your conviction; AND they all happen to be apart of the SAME club. (The BAR Association.)
You have to remember this in court. These are trained criminals. They have gone to school to learn how to be a criminal. They will swindle and trick you at any moment to get you to adhere to their legalese. Doing research is the best way you can learn about this topic. Understanding who you are as a man is critical. No man has the right or the ability to have control or steal from another man. No man has the right to take another mans home and give it to someone else. No one has the right to lord over you. We are all equal men, and a sovereign man bows to only one, and His name is Jesus Christ.

Leave a Reply

Notify of